Oxamflatin Induces E-cadherin Expression in HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cells

AUTHORS

Ebrahim Faghihloo ORCID 1 , * , Mojdeh Hakemi Vala 1 , Gita Eslami 1 , Hossein Goudarzi 1

1 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

How to Cite: Faghihloo E, Hakemi Vala M, Eslami G, Goudarzi H. Oxamflatin Induces E-cadherin Expression in HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cells, Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2018 ; 13(5):e66977. doi: 10.5812/archcid.66977.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases: 13 (5); e66977
Published Online: September 12, 2018
Article Type: Research Article
Received: February 3, 2018
Accepted: July 8, 2018
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is currently among the most important causes of cancer-related deaths in women. The development of cervical cancer is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and a series of epigenetic changes in host cell genome, such as histone acetylation. Furthermore, decreased E-cadherin level has been shown to play a critical role in cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Oxamflatin has been reported to have anti-cancer efficacy.

Objectives: We aimed to study the effect of this drug on cervical cancer cell lines, HeLa cells, by assessing E-cadherin level as a marker of cancer invasion susceptibility.

Methods: HeLa cells were treated with oxamflatin, and total RNA was obtained. Then, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to evaluate E-cadherin expression level in cells treated with oxamflatin.

Results: The findings of real-time PCR indicated that oxamflatin increased E-cadherin level in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The level of E-cadherin significantly increased at the concentrations of 4 mM (for 24 hours after treatment) and 2 and 4 mM (for 48 hours after treatment) in comparison with corresponding control HeLa cells.

Conclusions: The present study proposed that oxamflatin may have anti-migratory and anti-invasive potential against cervical cancer cells, which should be further evaluated in future studies.

Keywords

Cervical Cancer HPV Oxamflatin E-cadherin HeLa Cells

Copyright © 2018, Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Cervical cancer is regarded as one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths in women (1), emphasizing the importance of investigating new treatment drugs for this malignancy (2). It is estimated that 95% of cervical cancer cases are mediated by persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections (1), encoding two major oncoproteins of E6 and E7 that interact with and inactivate p53 and pRB cellular tumor suppressor proteins, respectively (3). The formation of cervical cancer is associated with several alterations in the epigenetic patterns of both HPV and host cells, such as DNA methylation, histone methylation, and histone acetylation (4). Histone deacetylases (HDACs) remove the acetyl groups on histone tails, which results in enhanced positive charge of histone proteins; this leads to more tightly folded DNA and then suppressed gene expression contributing to cancer (5). Oxamflatin, a novel HDAC inhibitor, has been shown to have strong cytostatic effects and potential toxicity against a variety of tumor cell lines (6).

E-cadherin is a major component in epithelial cell adhesion with a tumor suppressor function, loss of expression of which contributes to tumor development and metastasis (7). Studies showed that E-cadherin can be downmodulated or inactivated by mechanisms such as histone deacetylation in malignancies (8), an event that could be targeted by agents such as HDACIs for anti-cancer drug development.

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the anticancer properties of oxamflatin, an HDAC inhibitor, on the expression of E-cadherin in a HeLa cell line.

3. Methods

3.1. Cell Culture

HeLa cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), which was supplemented with 100 μg/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS).

3.2. Drug Treatment and Proliferation Assay

Oxamflatin was dissolved in different concentrations (1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 μM) of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The results were obtained by measuring absorbance at 570 nm.

3.3. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

After culturing HeLa cells in 12-well culture plates and obtaining a confluency of 80%, the cells were treated with the concentrations of 0, 1, 2, and 4 μM of oxamflatin for 24 and 48 hours, which subsequently were obtained and suspended in DMSO. Total RNA was extracted and cDNA was applied for real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.

3.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

During quantitative real-time PCR assay, E-cadherin mRNA level was determined by using a SYBR Green Master Mix. The expression of E-cadherin mRNA was performed using the following primer sequences: E-cadherin, forward: 5’-AGGGGTTAAGCACAACAGCA-3’ and reverse: 5’-GG-TATTGGGGGCATCAGCAT-3’. Then, its expression level was normalized to the level of endogenous housekeeping gene mRNA, GAPDH, by using the 2 -ΔΔct method.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Graph-Pad Prism software was applied to perform statistical analysis by the unpaired, two-tailed student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). P value less than 0.05 was regarded statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Oxamflatin Has Inhibitory Effects on the Viability of HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cell Line

The viability of HeLa cells was measured by the number of living cells at the concentrations of 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 μM of oxamflatin. The results indicated that oxamflatin treatment decreased the viability of HeLa cervical carcinoma cell lines more than 50% in 6 and 8 μM concentrations (Figure 1).

Treatment with 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 μM of oxamflatin decreases the viability of HeLa cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner.
Figure 1. Treatment with 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 μM of oxamflatin decreases the viability of HeLa cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner.

4.2. Oxamflatin Increases E-cadherin Expression in HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cell Line

Real-time PCR findings demonstrated that oxamflatin treatment led to a time- and concentration-dependent increase in the expression levels of E-cadherin in oxamflatin-treated HeLa cells 24 hours after treatment. In other words, the level of E-cadherin expression at the concentration of 4 mM significantly increased compared to that in corresponding control HeLa cells (Figure 2).

Oxamflatin treatment increases E-cadherin mRNA expression in HeLa cell lines 24 hours after treatment. The cells were treated with DMSO (control) and 1, 2 and 4 μM oxamflatin. P values less than 0.05 are flagged with one star (*).
Figure 2. Oxamflatin treatment increases E-cadherin mRNA expression in HeLa cell lines 24 hours after treatment. The cells were treated with DMSO (control) and 1, 2 and 4 μM oxamflatin. P values less than 0.05 are flagged with one star (*).

4.3. Oxamflatin Increases E-cadherin Expression in HeLa Cervical Carcinoma Cell Lines

Real-time PCR findings demonstrated that the levels of E-cadherin expression at the concentrations of 2 and 4 mM (for 48 hours after treatment) significantly increased relative to that in corresponding control HeLa cells (Figure 3).

Oxamflatin treatment increases E-cadherin mRNA expression in HeLa cell lines 48 hours after treatment. P values less than 0.05 are flagged with one star (*). P values less than 0.001 are flagged with three stars (***).
Figure 3. Oxamflatin treatment increases E-cadherin mRNA expression in HeLa cell lines 48 hours after treatment. P values less than 0.05 are flagged with one star (*). P values less than 0.001 are flagged with three stars (***).

5. Discussion

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) renders cervical cancer cells more susceptible to metastasis, and reduced expression levels of E-cadherin have been shown in this malignancy (9). E-cadherin is a pivotal molecule involved in epithelial cell adhesion, aberrant expression of which has been demonstrated in various human malignancies as a result of irreversible (genetic) and reversible (epigenetic) modifications of the E-cadherin gene (CDH1), such that the epigenetic ones have been more implicated in E-cadherin downregulation (10).

In this study, we evaluated the impact of oxamflatin on HeLa cell line by determining the expression level of E-cadherin. Our results demonstrated that oxamflatin treatment leads to a time- and concentration-dependent increase in E-cadherin expression in cervical cancer cell lines.

There is ample evidence reporting that HDACIs could be applied to re-express silenced genes (9, 11). For example, valproic acid (VPA), as a HDAC inhibitor, led to the re-expression of E-cadherin in both HPV-positive (HeLa and TC1 cell lines) and negative (MKN45 and HCT116 cell lines) cell lines (9). In a study by Deep et al. (11), silibinin (as a HDACI) was shown to possess anti-migratory and anti-invasive effects on prostate cancer (PCA) cells, in-part through the up-modulation of E-cadherin expression. Similarly, Mateen et al. (10), demonstrated that silibinin and HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA) elevated E-cadherin levels in different sub-types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells; silibinin and TSA also downregulated a transcriptional repressor known as Zeb1, which leads to E-cadherin suppression through interacting with CtBP (a transcriptional corepressor) that further increases the recruiting of HDACs to the E-cadherin promoter regions.

Studies have shown the effect of E6 and E7 oncoproteins on E-cadherin expression via different mechanisms (12, 13), for example the E7 protein downregulates the expression of E-cadherin in cervical cancer by the inhibition of Rb protein that has been demonstrated to enhance E-cadherin expression through the AP-2 transcription factor (14). Thus, it is supposed that oxamflatin, besides suppression of HDACs, decreases the expression of these oncoproteins and then leads to further augmentation of E-cadherin in these HPV-positive cell lines, which needs to be further studied in future investigations.

In sum, oxamflatin enhances E-cadherin expression in cervical cancer cell lines. Considering the anti-migratory and anti-invasive functions of this tumor suppressor protein, it can be concluded that oxamflatin may be applied to limit the development and metastasis of cervical cancer, which should be further investigated in future in vivo and in vitro studies.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Analytical Biological Services; Barretos Cancer Hospital; Baylor College of Medicine; Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, et al. Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature. 2017;543(7645):378-84. doi: 10.1038/nature21386. [PubMed: 28112728]. [PubMed Central: PMC5354998].

  • 2.

    Kumar RV, Bhasker S. Optimizing cervical cancer care in resource-constrained developing countries by tailoring community prevention and clinical management protocol. J Cancer Policy. 2014;2(2):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2013.11.002.

  • 3.

    Elrefaey S, Massaro MA, Chiocca S, Chiesa F, Ansarin M. HPV in oropharyngeal cancer: The basics to know in clinical practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(5):299-309. [PubMed: 25709145]. [PubMed Central: PMC4299160].

  • 4.

    Duenas-Gonzalez A, Lizano M, Candelaria M, Cetina L, Arce C, Cervera E. Epigenetics of cervical cancer. An overview and therapeutic perspectives. Mol Cancer. 2005;4:38. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-4-38. [PubMed: 16248899]. [PubMed Central: PMC1291396].

  • 5.

    Marks P, Rifkind RA, Richon VM, Breslow R, Miller T, Kelly WK. Histone deacetylases and cancer: Causes and therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1(3):194-202. doi: 10.1038/35106079. [PubMed: 11902574].

  • 6.

    Wang YL, Liui HL, Fu RG, Wang ZW, Ren HT, Dai ZJ, et al. HDAC inhibitor oxamflatin induces morphological changes and has strong cytostatic effects in ovarian cancer cell lines. Curr Mol Med. 2016;16(3):232-42. doi: 10.2174/1566524016666160225151408. [PubMed: 26917266].

  • 7.

    Liu YN, Lee WW, Wang CY, Chao TH, Chen Y, Chen JH. Regulatory mechanisms controlling human E-cadherin gene expression. Oncogene. 2005;24(56):8277-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208991. [PubMed: 16116478].

  • 8.

    Aghdassi A, Sendler M, Guenther A, Mayerle J, Behn CO, Heidecke CD, et al. Recruitment of histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 by the transcriptional repressor ZEB1 downregulates E-cadherin expression in pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2012;61(3):439-48. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300060. [PubMed: 22147512].

  • 9.

    Faghihloo E, Akbari A, Adjaminezhad-Fard F, Mokhtari-Azad T. Transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin and oncoprotein E7 by valproic acid in HPV positive cell lines. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2016;19(6):601-7. [PubMed: 27482340]. [PubMed Central: PMC4951598].

  • 10.

    Mateen S, Raina K, Agarwal C, Chan D, Agarwal R. Silibinin synergizes with histone deacetylase and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in upregulating E-cadherin expression together with inhibition of migration and invasion of human non-small cell lung cancer cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013;345(2):206-14. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.203471. [PubMed: 23461975]. [PubMed Central: PMC3629797].

  • 11.

    Deep G, Gangar SC, Agarwal C, Agarwal R. Role of E-cadherin in antimigratory and antiinvasive efficacy of silibinin in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(8):1222-32. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0370. [PubMed: 21546539]. [PubMed Central: PMC3151351].

  • 12.

    Faghihloo E, Sadeghizadeh M, Shahmahmoodi S, Mokhtari-Azad T. Transcriptional suppression of E-cadherin by HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncogenes is independent of hypermethylation of E-cadherin promoter. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;19(2). doi: 10.5812/ircmj.30434.

  • 13.

    D'Costa ZJ, Jolly C, Androphy EJ, Mercer A, Matthews CM, Hibma MH. Transcriptional repression of E-cadherin by human papillomavirus type 16 E6. PLoS One. 2012;7(11). e48954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048954. [PubMed: 23189137]. [PubMed Central: PMC3506579].

  • 14.

    Caberg JH, Hubert PM, Begon DY, Herfs MF, Roncarati PJ, Boniver JJ, et al. Silencing of E7 oncogene restores functional E-cadherin expression in human papillomavirus 16-transformed keratinocytes. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(7):1441-7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn145. [PubMed: 18566017].

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: